|
|
|
Effects of grain-based pecking blocks on productivity and welfare indicators in commercial broiler chickens |
Byung-Yeon Kwon1 
, Hyun-Gwan Lee1
, Yong-Sung Jeon1
, Ju-Yong Song1
, Jina Park1
, Sang-Ho Kim2
, Dong-Wook Kim3
, Kyung-Woo Lee1,*
|
1Animal Welfare; Broiler; Enrichment; Gut Health; Pecking Block
2K-AniWel, Suwon 16672, Korea
3Department of Livestock, Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju 54874, Korea |
Correspondence:
Kyung-Woo Lee, Tel: +82-2-450-0495, Fax: +82-2-455-1044, Email: kyungwoolee@konkuk.ac.kr
|
|
Received: 25 September 2023 • Revised: 30 October 2023 • Accepted: 12 December 2023 |
|
|
|
| Abstract |
Objective
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of grain-based pecking blocks on productivity and welfare status at two commercial broiler welfare-certified farms.
Methods
Production and welfare indicators were assessed at two farms (designated Farm A and B). Both farms had two windowless houses with forced tunnel-type ventilation and housed broilers at stocking densities of approximately 16.7 birds/m2 (Farm A) and 16.8 birds/m2 (Farm B). Each house was divided into two or three equal sections and was provided with or without pecking blocks. Grain-based pecking blocks, measuring 25 × 25 × 25 cm, were given to broilers in both farms at 1 block per 1,000 birds. Various parameters including productivity (body weight and flock uniformity), corticosterone levels (in fecal droppings and feathers), footpad dermatitis, hock burn, feather dirtiness, gait score, litter quality, body surface temperature, and volatile fatty acids in fecal samples were assessed at 26 days of age, whereas litter quality was analyzed at 13 and 26 days of age.
Results
There were no significant effects of providing pecking blocks on productivity (body weight and uniformity), fecal and feather corticosterone, welfare indicators (i.e., footpad dermatitis, hock burn, feather cleanliness, and gait score), and litter quality (i.e., moisture, nitrogen, and pH). No differences in body surface temperature between the control and enrichment treatments were noted in Farm B, but body surface temperatures of the head (p = 0.029) and legs (p = 0.011) in the enrichment vs. control group were elevated in Farm A. Butyrate concentration in the enrichment vs control group was higher in Farm B (p = 0.023), but this effect was not detected in Farm A.
Conclusion
It is concluded that grain-based pecking blocks did not affect performance and welfare indicators. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the potential impact of grain-based pecking blocks on gut health indicators. |
| Keywords:
Animal Welfare; Broiler; Enrichment; Gut Health; Pecking Block |
|
>
PubReader
ePub Link
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
