Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 38(5); 2025 > Article
Animal Breeding and Genetics
Animal Bioscience 2025;38(5): 898-909.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0643    Published online November 28, 2024.
Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic differentiation and selection signatures among wild, local and commercial duck populations
Zhirong Huang1,a  , Liyun Zhang1,a  , Maojun Luo1  , Xumeng Zhang1  , Yunmao Huang1  , Yunbo Tian1  , Zhongping Wu1,*  , Xiujin Li1,* 
College of Animal Science & Technology, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China
Correspondence:  Zhongping Wu, Tel: +86-20-89002081, Email: wuzhongping@zhku.edu.cn
Xiujin Li, Tel: +86-20-89002081, Email: lixiujin996@126.com
Received: 12 September 2024   • Revised: 20 October 2024   • Accepted: 27 November 2024
aThese authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the population genetic structure and genetic diversity among wild, local and commercial populations using whole-genome sequencing data from 416 individuals of 22 duck breeds in China and to further explore genetic pathways and candidate genes associated with importantly economic traits.
Methods
We performed principal component analysis, an unrooted neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree and ADMIXTURE to analyze the population structure. We compared the genetic diversity among wild, local and commercial populations using the effective population size, inbreeding coefficient, expected heterozygosity, observed heterozygosity, nucleotide diversity and regions of homozygosity. To detect selection signatures, we calculated the locus-specific branch length for local and commercial populations and calculated genetic differentiation coefficient and genetic diversity between egg and dual-purpose breeds.
Results
Wild, local and commercial duck populations formed three distinct genetic groups. The commercial population presented the lowest genetic diversity, the highest levels of inbreeding and the smallest effective population size. ADMIXTURE analysis also demonstrated that ducks were clearly divided into these three populations at K = 3. Selection signals in the commercial population were associated with growth and muscle development pathways, such as the mTOR signaling pathway and ErbB signaling pathway, and two key genomic regions (Chr1: 70.25 to 74.00 Mb and Chr2: 97.10 to 99.76 Mb) containing important genes, such as LRP6, BORCS5, and EDN1, were identified. In contrast, selection signals in the local population were associated with immune-related pathways involving NCAM2 and MPHOSPH6. Furthermore, PTGS2 and PLA2G4A genes were positively selected in egg breeds, whereas KCNK16, KCNK5, and KCNK17 genes were in dual-purpose breeds.
Conclusion
Because of artificial selection, wild, local and commercial populations presented obvious genetic differences. The selection signal analysis revealed that LRP6, BORCS5, and EDN1 are important for growth and muscle development; NCAM2 and MPHOSPH6 are for immune traits; and PTGS2 and PLA2G4A are for egg-related traits.
Keywords: Candidate Gene; Duck; Genetic Diversity; Selection Signal; Whole-genome Sequencing
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 285 View
  • 11 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : animbiosci@gmail.com               

Copyright © 2025 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next